Teacher’s Feedback In Writing Descriptive Text Made By Students
Keywords:
Teacher Strategy, feedback, Writing, Descriptive Text.Abstract
The purpose of this study is find out teacher’s strategy in giving feedback in writing descriptive text and to identify whether or not teacher’s feedbacks affect students in writing descriptive text. This research adopts qualitative research design. In collecting the data, the researcher will attempt to collect the data using a participant observation and questioner. The data analysis, the researcher uses three steps such as reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The result of the observation is that the teacher’s feedback in writing English made by students is Commentary, Correction, and Minimal Marking. The result of the teacher’s interview are conducted with six students coming from low, average, and high achievers. The writer found four kinds of students’ responses namely correcting, revising, consulting, and ignoring.
Downloads
References
Brown, H. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson Education Inc.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Longman: San Francisco State University.
Brown, H.Douglas.(2001). Teaching by principle: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy Second Edition. New jersey : prentice hall regents prentice all, Inc.
Cameron, Lynne. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
Corder, S.P. (1967). The significance of learner's errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(4), 161-170.
Corder, S.P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. London: Penguin Education.
Cumming, A. (2001). Learning to write in a second language: Two decades of research. International Journal of English Studies, 2, 1-23.
Edlin, Angela (2011). The nature of written feedback: A study of postgraduate lecturers' perspectives. Master thesis submitted to Unitec (Auckland, New Zealand). http://unitec.researchbank.ac.nz/handle/10652/1752?show=full.
Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition : An Introductory Course. New York: Routledge.
Hadley, A. O. (2001). Teaching language in context (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Harmer, Jeremy (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching . 4 th edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Harmer, Jeremy. (2007). How to Teach English. China: Pearson Education Limited.
Harmer, Jeremy. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. U.K: Pearson Education Limited.
Harmer, Jeremy. 1991. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Longman: Longman Group UK.
Hedge, et al. (1998). Teacher Feedback to Students in Numeracy Lessons: Are Students Getting Good Value?. [online] available at: http://www.asian-efljournal. com/June_05_yk&jk.pdf [January 9, 2013]
James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Essex: Pearson.
Jones, H. & Wheeler, T. (1983). A Training Course for TEFL. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaweera, C. (2013). Writing error: A review of interlingual and intralingual interference in EFL context. English Language Teaching, 6, 9-18.
Kayfetz, Janet L, and Stice, Randy L. (1987). Academically Speaking. California: Wadsworth, Inc.
Kim, S. (2001). An Error Analysis of college students' writing: Is that really Konglish? Studies in Modern Grammar, 25, 159-174.
Krashen, S.D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. US: Pergamon Press Inc.
Leki, L. (2001). Material, educational, an ideological challenges of teaching EFL writing at the turn of the century. International Journal of English Studies, 1, 197-209.
Lewis, M. (2002). Giving Feedback in Language Classes. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Lightbrown, P., & Spada, N. (1993). How language are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liu, M. (2013). An investigation of syntactic errors in Chinese undergraduate EFL learners’ compositions: A cohort study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2, 182-191.
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pawapatcharaudom, R. (2007). An investigation of Thai students' English problems on their learning strategies in the international program. Bangkok: MA Thesis, Mahidol University.
Richards, J. and Lackhart. 1994. Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ridha, N.S. (2012). The effect of EFL learners' mother tongue on their writings in English: An error analysis study. Journal of the College of Arts. 22-45.
Rivers, M. W. (1968). Teaching foreign language skil1s. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Sattayatham, A., & Honsa, S. (2007). Medical students' most frequent errors at Mahidol University, Thailand. Asian EFL Journal, 9, 170-194.
Watcharapunyawong, S. & Usaha, S. (2013). Thai EFL students’ writing errors in different text types: The Interference of the First Language. English Language Teaching, 6, 67-78.
Wee, R., Sim, J. & Jusoff, K. (2009). Verb-form errors in EAP writing. Educational Research and Review, 5, 016-023.
Oshima, A. & Hogue, A. (1997). Introduction to Academic Writing (2 Edition). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Umar Bakri, Ozi Satria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
